Custom Search

My Canada, I mean my Leaf team, includes Carl Gunnarsson



If you’re a General Manager, it’s probably best never to fall in love with a player (or at least very seldom) because you never know when you might have to move him along.  That’s just the way it is in the business that is the National Hockey League.

But as an observer of what happens in Leaf-urbia, if I had any say in the decision-making process, one player I would not be moving in an effort to get more offensive “punch” in the present line-up is defenseman Carl Gunnarsson.

Now, don’t get me wrong.  Gunnarsson is not the perfect player.  We all know that he appeared to regress a tad at the beginning and through the first half of last season.  But, like many Leafs, his play seemed to pick up by the end of the 2010-'11 season. 

I sometimes think that, in this unique hockey market, the fans, media and coaching staff are as much to blame for a player “slumping” as the player himself. Look at Jonas Gustavsson, for example.  He is facing a confidence crunch right now and it probably does not help that the local fan base and media hordes jump on every flaw, every play.  

This is not to suggest that a player should be blaming external factors for the on-ice issues he might face.  I simply mean that in this market, we do watch every mistake so closely that when a guy is "off"  for more than a shift, we start to say, “so and so isn’t playing well…”.  (It must be heaven playing in Tampa, where if two media people show up for practice that’s a big day for coverage of the local team.)

Look at the moment-by-moment commentary on Twitter.  It’s there every Leaf game.  One bad pass, and someone’s "having a lousy game".   Hey, it’s OK for us as fans to have those views.  That’s part of the fun of being a fan, for sure.

It’s just that, sometimes, if the player hears that enough (and they do hear things) before long the player starts thinking he is indeed struggling—and perhaps he was.  But finding the cure for a tough game or two with that kind of daily scrutiny isn’t easy, I don’t suspect.  (We are starting to see that already with Schenn this season.  As his minutes drop, and I’m as guilty as anyone, we are all kind of watching to see what happens.  Only seven games in, we are wondering:  why isn’t he playing as well as he did last season?  Is it a new defense partner?  The big new contract?  When in fact, the answer may simply be:  the guy is human and just hasn’t been as assertive as he was when he was playing strongly through much of 2010-’11 (though he has been a bit stronger the last couple of games).

We should probably all relax—most of all young Schenn.  We know he can play, so let’s let him play.

Which brings me to Gunnarsson.  I just like the guy, like the way he plays.  About a year ago, I opined that he had a bit of Nik Lidstrom in him.  Now, that may be a stretch, but I just think that he is only now beginning to grow into his full maturity as a bonafide NHL defenseman.  My snapshot viewing of him is that he can play at both ends of the ice.  He is not Bobby Orr offensively (is anyone?), but he can shoot the puck and has good instincts in the offensive zone.  I like that he doesn’t have to run at guys or bash people to take the puck away from a forward (hey, you need bashers, but big hits often lead to big risks, too).  He is deceptively fast, is a fine skater who can shift away from forecheckers  a bit like Kaberle and he’s pretty smart with--and without--the puck.  I think it was the other night in Boston when he very deftly deflected a big shot from Chara out of the rink.  No big splash, just a quietly effective moment in a game that requires a lot of those little plays for a team to be successful.

And, importantly, I think he’s the kind of d-man who will make his partner better, regardless of who the guy is.  If someone is struggling, I feel he is the kind of guy who can help settle his partner down and get his game back.

Sounds like a pretty good NHL defenseman to me—and we already have him.

So why do I even bother to raise his name?  Well, other than highlighting the fact that he is playing well (in my estimation) for the Leafs right now, I would hate for him to be the guy included in any kind of deal the Leaf brass may or may not be contemplating.

I mean, Schenn is not going anywhere, nor of course is Phaneuf.  Komisarek is playing better most nights, but no one will pick up that contract.  Liles is necessary as that skating, puck-moving, power-play defenseman.  Franson could be dealt but won’t return much.  Gardiner is staying put.

So if the Leafs need to get better in terms of their “top-six” forwards (and they do once they are serious about being a championship team) then they have to give something to get something.  And it just makes sense that other teams would inquire about Gunnarsson, because he was not a "Burke guy" and would appear to be the one defenseman who would be "available" and bring something worthwhile in return.

If you were the GM of another NHL team, wouldn’t you ask about Gunner?

Gunnarsson turns 25 next month.  When do NHL defensemen fully mature and play at the peak of their ability, in terms of physical presence, smarts, skill, etc.?  We can debate the point, but it is certainly sometime later than the age of 25 and before 35, though there may be occasional exceptions.

So Gunnarsson is just now entering his NHL prime, having played all of 115 regular-season games, though not any playoff games because, well, he plays in Toronto. He has international experience for Sweden and is just emerging as the kind of player I think he can be.

Too, I really like the fact that he has received a grand total of maybe 14 minor penalties so far in his young career.  Too often defensemen get “credit” because they have high penalty-minute totals.  Nice thought, except that most of the time these are bad penalties because of being out of position or simply making a poor play.  How does that help the team?  All it does is make the penalty-killing units work that much harder.  (That’s one of the things I liked about Kaberle; he rarely took dumb penalties to put the Leafs in a hole, because he was smart and could skate away from trouble without giving the puck away very often in his prime.)

All by way of saying that when Gunnarsson hits his peak years, I want it to be in blue and white, not in some market like Florida, Dallas or Nashville.  Let him become that solid, dependable, all-around (All-Star?) defenseman right here, with the Maple Leafs.

Somebody else will have to be trade bait.

9 comments:

  1. I'm with you, Michael. In fact, I think one could make a case that Gunnarsson has been the most consistent defenceman so far this year. He's not flashy, but he's effective. He takes his man out of the play and efficiently relieves him of the puck. He's rarely out of position, his passing is accurate, and as you say, he's a deceptive skater with a decent shot.
    Our defence seems much more mobile this year, and it's adding a needed dimension to our attack. But we need the stay-at-home guys too, and Gunnarsson has been an essential part of early season success. If I were Burke, it would take a lot to pry him loose from the team.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Long suffering Leaf fanOctober 24, 2011 at 9:37 AM

    Agree whole heartily Mike. Gunnarsson kind of reminds me of another young Swede D-man whom the Leafs were too quick to trade in hoping to make the playoffs. Sadly, even though it was great to have Wendel Clark back with the Leafs, and a descend D-man in Mathieu Schneider, it still pain my heart to see Kenny Jonsson wearing a Islander jersey.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Spot on article Michael L. My two cents : Gunnarsson was on the table earlier in the pre-season/season based on the assumption that Cody Franson would be an upgrade. Since that has not proven to be the case, at this point at least, Gunnarsson’s stock has risen enough to fend off bidders. Then again, a team like Montreal, should their slide continue, may want to break the bank in the hopes of fending off disaster. Like you, I am leery of letting this player go before his prime, simply because we do not know when and where his talent will peak.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Gerund O'...Agreed. I'm not saying "never", but I just don't want to move him. Too versatile which is awfully hard to find. And he's not as maddening as Kabby, for example.

    Long Suffering...oh my, good point about Jonnson. That created an issue at the time for me as well. Giving up young defensemen with real talent usually backfires...(didn't he play in the World Championships for Sweden as recently as two years ago...after many years with the Islanders...?)

    Bobby C...that's my sense, too, that he, like Kadri, was very much "in play". Hope that's changed, at least from Gunner's perspective...I just think the guy has a pretty high ceiling,

    ReplyDelete
  5. There is another scenario outside of the desperate team looking for a fix. A team top-heavy on offence might offer something substantial to upgrade their defence. Would we change our tune if Edmonton reached a point of making Jordan Eberle available, for example?

    ReplyDelete
  6. great post mike... gumnar is great..... who would you be comfortable parting with and why? (i think that's be an interesting entry topic)

    ReplyDelete
  7. Alex C...thanks. Very good question. Rather than quick a quick response, let me think on that. It may well be something I will post on. Thanks again.

    ReplyDelete
  8. It´s nice that you see Carl for the player he is. He doesn´t make anything flashy. He just read the play, gets his man and tangle him up. He don´t play hard but he is smart. He gives his opponent a push that´s big enough to get him out of balance but small enough to avoid a penalty. It´s a pleasure to really watch his play in front of his goalie and along the boards. Some people thinks he is soft - but truth is he is smart !

    Leafs fan i Sweden

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anon in Sweden...thanks for your comment. I think many Leaf fans are seeing Carl's play in very positive terms, precisely for the reasons you clearly describe.

    ReplyDelete